The Nigerian judiciary has long been plagued by corruption, nepotism, and lack of transparency. The role of the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) in the appointment and disciplinary processes of judges has been a subject of concern among legal practitioners and the general public. Mazi Afam Osigwe, SAN, a prominent legal practitioner, has raised valid concerns regarding the powers of the CJN and the need for constitutional amendments to address these issues.
One of the main concerns raised by Osigwe is the potential conflict of interest created by the CJN’s role as the head of the National Judicial Council (NJC) and the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC). The NJC is responsible for the appointment, promotion, and discipline of judges, while the FJSC recommends judges for appointment to the NJC. As the chairman of both bodies, the CJN has significant power in these processes, which could lead to a lack of objectivity and transparency.
Osigwe suggests that the CJN should be removed as the head of the NJC to ensure greater independence and autonomy in the appointment and disciplinary processes. He proposes involving independent bodies and civil society organizations in the appointment process to enhance transparency and accountability. This would ensure that arrangements are made based on merit and not influenced by personal or political interests.
Another issue raised by Osigwe is the overlapping roles of the CJN as the chairman of the NJC and FJSC. This creates a potential conflict of interest when the same person chairs both bodies, as the FJSC recommends judges for appointment to the NJC, which then deliberates on these recommendations. Osigwe suggests separating the chairmanship of these bodies to ensure a more objective and unbiased decision-making process.
In terms of institutional development, Osigwe emphasizes the need to review the composition of the FJSC and NJC to enhance their independence and autonomy. By separating the chairmanship and ensuring a diverse representation, he believes these bodies can generate resolutions and recommendations that are perceived to have undergone an objective evaluation.
Osigwe’s views on the powers of the CJN and the need for constitutional amendments have been widely discussed among legal practitioners and the general public. While his proposals aim to strengthen the Nigerian judiciary, they require careful consideration and discussion among relevant stakeholders, including the National Assembly, to ensure the effectiveness and fairness of the proposed reforms.
In conclusion, the concerns raised by Osigwe regarding the powers of the CJN and the need for constitutional amendments to address these issues are valid and require urgent attention. The Nigerian judiciary must be strengthened to ensure that appointments and disciplinary actions are based on merit and not influenced by personal or political interests. By promoting transparency, accountability, and independence, the Nigerian judiciary can restore public confidence in the justice system and uphold the rule of law.
For Advert Inquiries & News/Article Publishing